About
A-76 Process
CSM
Library
Best Practices
FAQs
Community
Buddy

Administrative Appeal Process



Administrative Appeal Process 
An Administrative Appeal is a challenge to a cost comparison decision based on asserted errors in the cost comparison process. To be considered an eligible appeal subject to review by the Administrative Appeal Authority, the issues must be raised by eligible appellants, meet criteria established in the OMB Circular A-76 Revised Supplemental Handbook, and be submitted in writing to the Contracting Officer prior to the end of the Public Review Period.

What is the Public Review Period?

The Public Review Period is the amount of time available for public review of all documentation associated with a cost comparison decision. The Public Review Period begins on the date all supporting documentation is made publicly available and normally ends within 20 calendar days. For particularly complex cost comparisons, the Contracting Officer may extend the Public Review Period to a maximum of 30 calendar days. The last day of the Public Review Period also coincides with the last day an Administrative Appeal by an eligible appellant may be filed.

Who are eligible appellants during a cost comparison?

Eligible appellants include only those individuals or organizations that could be affected by the tentative cost comparison decision to convert to or from in-house, contract, or ISSA performance as a result of the cost comparison. Such individuals include the following:
  • The affected in-house employees (i.e., appropriated or non-appropriated fund civilian employees being cost-compared whose work is being competed) or their representative(s),
  • Contractors who have submitted formal offers,
  • An agency that has submitted a formal offer via an Interservice Support Agreement (ISSA),
  • A non-selected contractor. A non-selected contractor is permitted to appeal in case the contractor originally selected to compete against the in-house offer is reversed via GAO protest.
What documentation is generally made available to affected parties during the Public Review Period? The following documentation is generally made available:
  • The solicitation, including the Performance Work Statement (PWS),
  • The completed Cost Comparison Form (CCF),
  • Back-up documents for the In-House Cost Estimate (IHCE), such as the audit trail and materials lists,
  • The complete Government Management Plan,
  • The name and price of the apparent successful offeror/bidder.
What should the appeal team do after the tentative decision?

After the tentative decision, the appeal team generally must concentrate its efforts on two sets of documents: the Government Management Plan and associated documents, including the Technical Performance Plan and the IHCE/CCF, and the selected contractor's technical proposal, completed Section B, and other associated non-proprietary information included in the selected contractor's proposal. In its review, the appeal team analyzes the information in each set of documents separately to identify any costing, transposition or other errors, and then analyzes the documents together to uncover any differences in the level of support provided. Using this two-pronged approach enables the appeals team to thoroughly scrub both proposals for compliance with the requirements of the solicitation, the A-76 Circular and the Revised Supplemental Handbook. In-depth familiarity with the solicitation and the rules associated with the cost comparison process as contained in OMB Circular A-76, the Revised Supplemental Handbook and any DoD or Component policies greatly expedites the ability of the appeal team to quickly complete a thorough analysis.

What is a tentative cost comparison decision?

The tentative cost comparison decision is the initial decision of the Source Selection Authority based on a comparison of the in-house offer against the Contract/ISSA offer (i.e., cost comparison). This is before the Public Review Period and Administrative Appeal Process, after which the final cost comparison decision is made.

What is the best way to get the MEO out to all affected parties?

The public review period cannot begin until after this is performed. The public review period begins on the day the completed cost comparison form and all supporting documentation is made available to directly affected parties. While the distribution of hard copies is not mandated, electronic distribution should be used only where all affected parties have convenient access to computers and e-mail. If the documentation is not available when the tentative cost comparison decision is announced, the time allotted for submitting appeals is extended by the number of days equal to the delay in making the documentation available.

What happens if the final cost comparison favors an in-house (Government) decision?

In this case, the solicitation is cancelled and the Most Efficient Organization (MEO) is implemented in accordance with the Government Management Plan.

What happens if the final cost comparison decision favors Contract/ISSA performance?

In this case, the contractor is awarded the contract. The Human Resources Office begins to process appropriate personnel actions, such as voluntary early retirement authority, voluntary separation incentive pay, priority placement programs, transition assistance, reduction in force, etc.

Is the contractor required to hire Government civilian employees who may lose their jobs?

Those employees have a right of first refusal. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.207-3 (Right of First Refusal of Employment) states:"The contractor shall give Government employees who have been or will be adversely affected or separated as a result of award of this contract the right of first refusal for employment openings under the contract in positions for which they are qualified…" This FAR clause is included in the contract solicitation. It requires contractors to give qualified civilian employees, adversely affected as a result of the conversion, the right of first refusal for job vacancies under the contract. It does not require the contractor to hire any Government employee whom they believe are not qualified. Historically, the contractor hires many of the displaced Government employees.

Resources:

Policy
Guides and Recommended Readings